Thursday, July 5, 2018

A game played under multiple variables - called life!

Life is a very interesting game, which is played among multiple players and under the circumstances of variable rules. Game goes on till last breath and no one wins it . What is important is knowing rules at particular point in time and knowing the fact that rules are variable, can amend in next moment. So one should keep upgrading himself about the updates and amendments . In other words , change is the only constant in the world , otherwise universe is changing every moment. So cope up yourself with changing rules , be aware about and always on toes.
Second interesting part of this game is while you are playing among the players , these players  are also not stagnant by their position . They keep changing their stance , side and tactics every moment. There might be the chances, those were on your side moments before might be with opponent now and in another next moment back with you. Their position also depend on the various games as well , they may be on your side in one game but may not be in next game .
Further to play it well , one should    also have facts with him and avoid the noise. For example , you should estimate the current situation quite well and anticipate the likelihood scenario of amendment in rules during play. One should also consider the interest of teammates in mind , and anticipate the conditions where one can change the side , while their interest has been changed.
Under these multiple variables , it’s not possible to get desirable outcome every time but this should not detract you, every time in following the principles of game. So enjoy your game 😊!

- Bhagwan

Wednesday, October 25, 2017

View about China and Chinese

When you meet US business man in China and ask about his neutral views about both the countries, he makes following points -
1) Chinese have better trust factor between themselves, while every India want to stole or loot the others wealth . Social and culture fabric is much more stronger in Chinese then Indians. Due to this trust factor American prefers working with Chinese, despite they being poor in communication.
2) American ( He) does not like blank faces of Chinese during roaming around and interaction ( while going for buying anything in the market , Chinese does not even smile and wave off in smiley manner) , opposite to this they also not like Indian's over reactions and overselling attitude as well, let them be sober.
On my argument that , once larger pie of wealth will flow to us , Indian will also become social and trustworthy to each other - he gives interesting facts of China and South Korea , both were social and trustworthy even when these countries were poor. I thought of Nepal , people are more trustworthy though not very rich !
2) He feels more safe in Chines exteriors then India , while traveling.
3) Chinese are not innovative and not have very high ambitions of owning a company and being CEOs while Indian's are much more innovative and pragmatic in their approach .
4) Now a days, effluent Chinese are chasing Western universities for their kids education and they feel one notch up in ladder , same is the scenario with India.

My personal observations with China and Chines goes like this - biggest and most imperative reason for China's success has been their communist government and slave mind set of people - they have to just follow their king's wish . Hence , it was their king's will to come out of poorness. He provided road map for that to the public and public followed it blindly . Though we can call it their slavery of mind but in other aspect it also looks like trusting their leader utmost - which I think very important factor of their progress - no body questioned top leadership, public end up in good to do position. I am not against the democracy but too much democracy makes ruin of too many neive people who does not understand even meaning of it .
Chinese don't have envy with Indian and with each other though there may be some political issues.
As a person they feel themselves underdogs in maximum fields against Indians, - this seems another reason of their success .
I sense that even today - they don't realize or it's does not reflect in their attitude that they are so rich or second economy of the world .

Tuesday, September 20, 2016

Trade off- significance in sociaty

Trade off - very interesting word in economics, similar interesting in social life. While playing chess, sometimes I am interested in calculating trade offs between Queen and other twos and vice-versa .
Let me directly come to the point -
A very old, reputed and respected Hindu organization in India , where I used to be part of it almost for 2 years for full time and another 2-3 years part time. My understanding about this organization depends on two factors, first  I lived full time for 2years on district level office where Pracharak and other related people were living full time there and their activities were always in-front of my eyes. All the major activities of this organization were being controlled from that office. Influential people of city associated with organization used to visit it occasionally. So I got enough interaction opportunity with most of the people associated with it full time or part time.Second, I was too young ( 14-16 years old) to judge philosophy of an organization at that point in time.

It took me almost a decade to decide to be or not to be with the philosophy of organization. Though , still I am not pretty sure whether it's philosophy is right or not right in larger interest of society.
In my personal view , this organization has two flip sides , one is very constructive, disciplinary and character building of a person by practicing daily Shakha's and Baudhiks ( speeches). This side gives you proud of being Hindu, being Indian , being associated with organization, believing in brotherhood and extending helping hands for the people in any kind of emergency.

However, flip side of this organization leads you to be extremist and radical in your thought process. These people question, role of Mahatma Ghandhi and many other freedom fighters in our independence. Some time, they introduce their role models from history , and claim them to be more superior than the existing ones with whom you are much familiars.
Most importantly, ostensibly, they pronounced that they believe in brotherhood-ness and are not against any religion, particularly Muslims. As a matter of fact, they are one, who sow hate seeds in your fertile brain at very early stage against Muslims by telling you stories related Mughal,s attack over India and Muslim ruled us for centuries before English. Without actual realization, your brain will be hijacked for radical and extremist thinking. Once you are in circle , rather than judging your stance your priorities become to bring in more radical people or make people with extremist thought in the circle.
Here concept of trade off is very important , which took me almost many years to decide to be associated with organization by considering benefits of it or leave it by considering drawbacks.
I still believe that many good people also belongs to the same organization, who lead from front and represented country's top post. These people are much focused on character building and takes pride of being Hindu but are not tilted towards the flip side of coin, owning some body, s mind against Muslims and any other religion. I am still in touch with many individuals belongs to the organization and visit them occasionally.
Another difference between this Hindu organization and other radical thinking organizations ( antagonists) , I found that this organization is very soft but continuous in hammering your brain to be extremist in your thoughts , while antagonist seems very tough in this regard. That may be another reason of surviving this organization for such a longer period and its acceptance in society.
Though my cause of worry  is that people already with radical thought are finding this organization suitable  platform to nurture their extremism, and becoming more dangerous for society in their thought process. I request organization to dilute their agendas some where and being crystal clear in their philosophy and goals to save the society before saving the nation.

Friday, June 28, 2013

My maiden voting right experience!!!

I was on the way from Delhi to my village,on one Friday evening, in the month of June 2007. Day was too hot to get out of the home during the day, hence I preferred evening 5 O'clock to take ride on my Pulsar 150cc.I have been always crazy for its riding and 130 KM distance from Delhi to village was a matter of two and half hour fun for me. However, on that evening riding was not for fun but for another cause, which was exciting me of my importance, responsibility, maturity and above all citizenship right. Yeah...on next day morning I was suppose to use  my maiden citizenship right  by casting a vote in Gram Panchayat Election . Thanks to Indian democracy and system of electing our representative by way of voting process, so that,  it gives millions of people a moment of pride of being citizen of it, at least once in five year. Otherwise most of the time, we are treated as poor, helpless, mango people, made for extortion, zero value of no importance etc. My chest widen by inch  when I felt  importance of my voting right, for which, I got a special invitation from 2 different contestants to come to village on each ones expenditure. Best of my memory, one of them has never exchanged any word of good or bad wishes with me in the last 25 years of my life.Though, second one was my neighbor, who has been in usual touch and pretended to be my well wisher always.

Mudilia is just 130 Km away from Delhi's Nizamuddin Bus Stand  but inconvenience of connectivity  to main roads and towns widens the gap and Delhi seems far away from. However, presently, Yamuna Express way has linked it to Noida and has reduced the distance to 60 Km only. Including one more small village, i.e Khanpur (~200 voters), which is the part of the same Gram Panchayat, there would be total ~1500 voters in 2007. The stories of Gram Panchayat elections have always been very  interesting and funny in my village, but this time I got an opportunity to watch it closely and to withdrew some interesting facts. Actually, Mudilia is again divided in two small villages i.e Mudilia (Badi) and Mudilia (Chhoti). Luckily, I was born in Mudilia Badi and was always full of vanity of belonging. However, there was nothing big in Mudilia Badi except big by population (~800 voters), or suffice to say that it was smaller economically, literally and culturally, which I realized later on.

Elections are contested there by keeping larger view  in mind of  Kunba, where voters are allured firstly on the basis of village and then Kunba. Since the time of independence, I never heard of any Pradhan was elected from  Khanpur village, because of its cult of being smaller by population. Hence, it is oblivious to understand that most of the time Pradhani crown  went to Mudilia (Badi). This time game was between three players Ranveer Singh and Ashok from Mudilia (Badi) and Chander from Mudilia (Chhoti).
There are 3 Kunba's in each Mudilia (Badi and Chhoti). In Mudilia Badi largest one Kunba known as Sataua, second large is Bhakhar and third one is Tihaua. Certain number of migrants also have adjusted themselves as part of either one of these Kunba, depending on their ancestor's belongings to any of these. Ranveer Singh is a migrant (know as pie in local language) but belongs to Bhakhar and his father (Chhatter Singh) enjoyed Pradhani's Crown for almost 15 years. Best trick worked in his favor was disputed land issue between Chhela (Ashok's father who was from Satua's Kunaba) and Radha (from Tihua's Kunaba), where Chatter Singh always and strongly supported Chhela and helped him in legal proceedings due to his contacts with government Babus and Police officers, as a result most of the votes from Satua's Kunaba was in his favor. On the other hand,  he was successful in gathering most of votes of his own Kunba i.e Bhakar. Additionally, his heroic image, well known personality and most importantly  closeness with bureaucrats helped him to garner the votes of poor and schedule caste group, which is known as deciding factor in wining the elections. The illiteracy and ignorance of law and order are big fears for most of these people, who are always afraid of any issue which is associated with Police and Judiciary etc. Hence, multiple factors worked in his favor or may be it was his political trick to keep alive land dispute for longer period, which benefited him in three consecutive wins in Gram Panchayat elections.

 Though in 2007, things were different , Chhatter Singh died in the year 2002 and land dispute issue was almost in favor of Chhela after ~30 years of legal and physical fights. Ashok (son of Chhela), who returned to the village after retirement from Indian Army, took aggressive stance in local politics and elected Gram Panchat Head (Pradhan) two consecutive times  before 2007. In his first election (1997) he cheated Ranveer  by promising  him favor for BDC elections, which were held simultaneously. He kept Ranveer  in the dark up to the last day of elections and  favored Prempal (another guy from his own Kunaba). This incident disappointed very much to Ranveer Singh and  friendship and closeness of two families turned into bitterness and separated each-other. Ashok betrayed Ranveer, whom father was legal adviser and supporter of Ashok's father in land dispute case and helped him in winning the  case ultimately.Though, Chhela (Ashok's father) was very much disappointed from this event and he consent his guilt some where in his inner self and was seen rarely in public meetings due to his betrayal image. On the other side, Ashok was having different view, according to him, Chhattar Singh had  cheated his father on financial front for almost thirty years of his life and had taken double amount, what was actually bribed for Government Babus, Lawyers, Police Officers and other legal issues.Transfer of  power and ideas in between generations had never been a smooth process in Indian history, either it has hearten ancestors or disappointed predecessors to survive in old cage. Many times  this disappointment leads to frustrations and finally to revolts. 

This time Ranveer Singh was preparing to  head on directly with Ashok and was willful to take revenge of 1,997 defeat and betrayal. Due to anti- incumbency factor Khanpur villager's  were likely to vote against Ashok, but at the same time they never favored any contestant from Mudilia Chhoti. Hence, Ranveer  was appropriate and only option for them to choose. Also, they had been supporter of Chhatter Singh in his tenure. Anti-incumbency  factor in Khanpur, (which can work only in that village due to neutrality ) , certain sycophants of Chhatter Singh were ready to favor his son and to go against their own Kunba's candidate i.e. Ashok,  illusion of getting healthy voting sharing of schedule cast and support by his own Kunba i.e Bhakhar were  four main factors to keep Ranveer alive in the race.

On the other side, Mudilia Chhoti also has three Kunbas i.e Tihaua, (largest by population), Pachaua (second large) and Sataua (smallest) with total ~ 500 voters. Chander belongs to Pachaua group and he was never wishful to fight election but due to his integrity and kindness image, he was pushed into the battle ground by certain pseudo intellectuals of village.Their ostensible purpose was favorism of him but actually they all were lobbying against Ashok, who was suppose to make hat trick of winning three consecutive elections in a row. Among the lobbyist,  two lead people were from Mudilia Baddi, my father Bijendra Singh and his close aide Bhudeva (allies Rao Saab). My father was having strong grip in his own Kunba i.e Bhakhar and has always  been in opposition of Ashok's family since the time of land dispute between him (Ashok) and Radha, despite that his relations were  normal with Chhatter Singh due to neighborhood. On the other side Rao Saab was a migrant, though he was part of  Sataua's Kunba but never ever favored Ashok's family. His strength was his own large family of almost 100 voters and his shrewd political tricks. For implementing these tricks he always used credibility of my father's face value.    

Now it was a triangle fight between three contestants and outcome was to be very exciting. Ashok was overconfident of striking hat trick. Ranveer was also confident but quite nervous due to partition of votes in the same village while Chander was solo contestant from his own village. My father and Rao Saab were supporting Ranveer ostensibly but were well aware of the fact that he was hardly to be a winning horse. At the same time it was necessary to keep him in race till the final moment to assure Ashok's defeat. Because, he was to divert certain votes of Sataua's Kunba, who were along with him due to his father's face value, certain votes of Khanpur, who were along with him due to anti-incumbency but were not willing to vote for Chander due to unusual relation with his village and obliviously most of votes of his own Kunba i.e Bhakar.  

In my view, this was the entire theme of political game where shrewdness worked and was required. The goal of Ranveer Singh, my father and Rao Saab was same, defeat of Ashok. But, three were having different game plans. Ranveer was willing to defeat him along with greed for power, while my father and Rao Saab were plotting the plan to bring his (Ashok's) arrogance down on the ground. For which these both were willing  Ranveer Singh to remain in the fight till last moment, which was likely to divide certain votes of Sataua's (Ashok's Kunba)  Khanpur's and Bhaker's  in favor of him, who were supposed to go back to Ashok in absence of Ranveer's candidature.  Though, second game plan of the situation would had been shared with Ranveer, which was serving his ostensible purpose also of defeating Ashok but biggest risk to that  was Ranveer's swinging nature and  his likely dilution with Ashok. Greediness has never been a good idea for constructive works. However, certain close allies of Ranveer informed him of dual political trick of Rao Saab of internally supporting Chander and ostensibly being with him. This was the right time where Rao Saab en-cashed my father's face value, who was known for his morals, integrity and commitments. As a result, Ranveer was entrapped in pseudo-confidence.  This entire situation for my father was like of Yudhister, when he was asked by Dronacharya in Kurushetra for confirmation of Aswasthama's death. My father's integrity, face value and Rao Saab's shrewdness kept Ranveer alive in the race almost for twenty days and till the last moment, who was blind with greed and could not sense their motive.

As it was expected, voters of Satua's, Bhakher, Khanpur and schedule castes were divided between Ranveer and Ashok.   Tihaua's votes, though small in count , who were real foes of Ashok and  Ranveer was also never  favorite for them due to his father's open support to Chhela in land dispute case, went in favor of Chander. Along with that, Rao Saab and my family's members also caste their voting rights for Chander except two individual votes of Rao Saab and my father, who were liable and committed to  vote in favor of Ranveer only. Though it was heard that certain votes from Mudilia Chhoti were caste against Chander and in favor of Ashok, but those were very few in numbers to make any difference. I was very much confused till the last moment of deciding my vote at polling booth. In my view, this was betrayal to go against Ranveer but I was having faith and confidence in my father's view of never being wrong, which  compelled me to vote in favor of Chander. That was probably the last time when my arguments bowed down against my father's mount peaking personality. Though he did not insist me to vote for Chander but I could not collect courage to go against his cause. Ultimately I end up by stamping my maiden voting right against my will and in favor of my father's cause.
      
Though, most of people, including of opposition party,  were almost sure for Chander's win but I was predicting it to be very close fight. Finally, hard work and shrewd tricks of Rao Saab's paid his way and after ten days of election I heard news of Chander's victory by the margin of  11 votes only, inline with my guess. Later on Ranveer also realized that perhaps it was hard to win for him in this situation but his candidature helped in assuring Ashok's defeat, which was a satisfactory note for him. He usually calls himself BAZIGAR (Har ke jeetne wale ko Bazigar kahte hain). He never complained of my father & Rao Saab's stance on that situation, infect he started admiring them for their political vision. My father is no more in this world but Ranveer still has very usual relations with my family & with Rao Saab's also. He can be seen in long discussions with Rao Saab randomly. Perhaps he still have political ambitions in his life and might be learning certain tricks from Rao Saab. On my next trip to my village, when I went to meet Rao Saab on his house he had been rewarded with the new name "Chankaya of Mudilia's politics". Though Rao Saab is not exposed to corporate level but leadership qualities not have any walls. Surely I am keen to imbibe some of his tricks and want to nurture them to give giant shape in corporate world. I strongly believe that most of big ideas are born inside 10x10 laboratory.

Thursday, March 14, 2013

Too big to fail

"Too big to fail" is very popular theory in economics. I don't know very precise meaning of that but some how I sense two meaning out of it....one is that country can not afford the failure of a big institution due to post disastrous consequences (chain reaction) of the event. Second...its all about of arrogance of large institutions, who strongly believe that they are immortal. Just to bring in notice ....both theories are irrelevant in practical term. Fall of LTCM to Lehman Brothers have been classic example in US history.
In India,  Despite sensing the horrified consequences post "1998 Nuclear Test", Indian Government took the decision to go ahead with that. Once again at this time, I would like to remind the events of Anna Hazare's anti-corruption movement & death of Gaddafi in Libya , which were almost impossible to imagine before it happened.

Although, I am not a big admirer of Arvind Kejriwal but today's his demand of cancellation of Bank licenses of HDFC bank, Axis Bank & ICICI bank, post money laundering exposure by Cobra Post & than reaction of many readers on that was very surprising to me. Arvind demanded what would have been morally and patriotically right.If these banks or any other institution can not prioritize country's benefit, I think it has no  rights to run its operations more. But reactions of readers were like that  he (Arvind) was demanding like a naughty & stub burned child for bringing moon on earth. Most of the readers were of the view that canceling license of  these banks is impossible, will not be right decision for economy and will be a full of emotions. It may lead to inefficiencies in the banking and financial system & millions of people will became unemployed.

So far it looks that message from public is very clear, whenever it comes to the government & politicians, we all are echoing same voice that Government & politicians are corrupt but at the same time, we don't want to give-off our jobs  for saying no to bad practices.
In another way, given the few examples above in discussion from Lehman Brother's to India's Nuclear Test....forget to sense that we can not afford cancellations of banks licences & removal of other bad practices in India...but the realty is that we are in very comfort zone of saying no to these all........we can not afford short term pains for long term gains.  Race in between and easy access to short cuts have ruined our patriotism.  Finally, we don't want to be change, we want to see.  

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Lingering approaches:….moot question

We, most of Indians, are very well known for procrastination habits. Our culture, tradition and most important conditions are responsible for that. Charles Darwin’s theory “Survival of fittest” is appropriately applicable over our life style. Our whole life is into vein, into struggle, where we are trying to carve out a niche. We are also well known creature on the earth for hard work (attitude) for mere pennies.
These contradictory thoughts (one way procrastinations & other way hard working attitude) are continue to boggle my mind since the last few sessions. …Yeah, I may be wrong with contradictory statements made above, but matter of fact is, ….this is incredible India…where unity in diversity …perfection in contradiction are the popular slogans for survival.
Like millions of Indians, I am also great follower of Mr APJ Abdul Kalam, who wore country’s top crown of presidency in recent past. His impressive life style and hair style influenced me to know little more of him and I ended up by reading his auto biography “Wings of Fire”. Being a very short in memory, I don’t remember the entire story but Mr Kalam mentioned that he likes attitude of Americans, who do not linger problems and love to shoot it out from root at very early stage, unlike Indians, who carry it through entire life and sometime after that also.
Why are not Europeans taking clue from Americans?,……There was time in mid 2011 when everyone was concerned of America’s mounting debt scenario. People were of the view, including me, that China or may be down the line India, are most likely to replace world power in next 30-50 years horizon. US currency was in doldrums. However, few of my colleagues, obliviously more experienced, were very confident that US is known for accepting their mistakes at very early stage and taking the corrective actions quickly. Now days, there is too much pessimism around the world, everyone is thinking that other countries are going to die tomorrow except US. Hence all are buying only USD to survive in future. As a result, US Treasury bond yield has gone down below it was in World War II in 1945. I could not understand, this is the ability of US to recover itself too quickly or it is disability of European countries, where PIIGS are continuously in need of bail out …firstly it was Ireland than Greece and now Spain. Germany is trying to save her own nose …and continue to linger the problem.  More than 1 trillion euro has been infused in the system till date. Why not let Greece go to bankrupt? Why are those (Europeans) lingering its bankruptcy? Why are those not clear with their object? They want to save the nation or to save world? If we try to understand economic discrepancies, in both the scenario either you save it (Greece) or lose it ….world is going to be net sufferer, off course Greece too. Now moot question is that which one is the best way to follow? Bail it out or let it bankrupt? Or in which scenario disaster is likely to be lesser?
See the attitude of Germany & America ....Angela Merkel is always in discussion of austerity with European nations where Barack Obama is suggesting her to focus more on growth. Entire scenario reminds me of my heart’s closest story of a farmer, who was indebted with huge amount (~10 times of his income) of debt and lost his mental control in wiriness. Than his educated son, of whom education expenses were responsible for indebted condition of his father,   took over his father’s legacy crown and followed American model of trouble shooting. He sold out his ancestor’s 1/6th assets (mainly land) to bailout his father and to follow growth model. No doubt, after 4 years of his decision, he is riding high on the growth of above 3 times of country’s GDP CAGR, but in the process, he lost his father. Poignancy is that individuals are important for their near and dear ones, nations are important for their citizens. Nations are immortal …if defaulted…require many times energy to regain their status. Same like poor farmer…who could not consolidated his energy to regain his status …and lost his life. Still, rich son of poor dad evaluates his past and often has discussions with me….”was I wrong? ….did I took decisions with immaturity in hurry? Or do I have lingered the problem for few more years to save my father’s life?”  …..I don’t have answers for his query but have a second thought in mind.” It depends on preference …what is important for you? Lingering with problems but enjoying family OR enjoying success, living dreams of your ancestors and constructing stairs for coming generations to ease the path?” it’s all up to you….. if you have guts to take challenges…take them and prove yourself…..there is no definite solution of economic problems…. no matter which way you follow….hit the bull’s eye at the end!!!     

Friday, October 21, 2011

Best strategy to follow for our (corrupt) politicians

World is changing with a very fast pace. Things which seem next to impossible are turning to reality. Anna's campaign against corruption in India, liberalization in Libya after the death of Gaddafi are the two recent prominent incidents, which allow me to think again that everything is possible...yeah but change may come too early is still my hallucination.
Earlier in the books, I read about various civilizations like Harappa, Mohenjo daro etc as well as of many sculptures, which details of various "Yugs" and their transformation. According to our mythology, transformation of one Yug to another took thousands of years. In modern history, British ruled India almost 200 years before we tasted freedom in 1947 fighting for almost 90 years (from 1857- first fight against British rule till 1947). While Gaddafi ruled Libya for 42 years before he died in October, 2011. However, revelation against him was for less than one year. Once upon a time, Lalu claimed that he will rule Bihar for next 20 years before his end up in 15 years. No one imagined of such a fast economic & political recovery in Bihar after Nitish Kumar appointed chief minister in 2005.
Many intellectuals claim that cause of many intricacies & wrong suffering is dearth of knowledge. I agreed their views, but also I am of the view that easy & fast access of information (knowledge) contributes lot for speedy development & change. I appreciate Anna's vision of fighting first for "Right to Information" then fighting for change on the basis of that information. Our countries corrupt & delighted politician had never thought of such a drastic speedy change of their miserable life. Yesterday’s heroes have turned today’s villain. Earlier, there was a well non misperception in our system that corrupt file of powerful people opens only after their death. Which has been a most motivating factor for them not to do good things in their life, and always approaching short cuts to achieve long goals.
In the current scenario, the ruling party members are taking every possible effort to mask the voice of team Anna to save their (ruling party members) real faces. They are blaming team Anna of being corrupt. Hence, either they will bring a law that a corrupt teacher cannot teach a lesson of morality to government OR the government will give an open offer to team Anna to join them by quoting “we all are son of same mother “Bharat Mata” come join us and we will loot country people together”. But the second option might dilute their (government) profitability share, so what next ploy they have in their bag? Heed to our PM’s statement of curbing the rights of "Right to Information" act. My suggestion to this ploy is, if ruling party really wants to save their share of profitability; best way is to curb the technology and accessibility of information. Conflict of interest is that one way government is distributing laptops (under the project “Akash”) at only Rs 1500 in colleges & universities which will increase the accessibility of information, other way it wants to curb information. I understand that our economist (sitting with policy makers in parliament) have rightly estimated the importance of technology in the development of our economy. Also the contribution of technology & accessibility of information can’t be ignored after 1991, when our economy was opened first time for globalization. At the same time they (economist) have not rightly estimated the curse of technology to ruling party members.
I believe that our economists are not good politician and they are pushing the life of our renowned politicians to hell. My straight sense is that ruling party members can’t blame only Anna for such a worst (from ruling party’s point of view) anti corruption movement, they also have to curse themselves of bringing technology & accessibility to the country.
Future is not in the favor of corrupt politicians & leaders, India is shining, technology is penetrating to villages rapidly and accessibility and affordability of information is increasing. Penetration of 3G from city to village’s level will eventually lead to maximum hits to Google, the search engine. Indian brains are very well known for their good analytical skills, which may end up in origination of millions of Annas. Facing millions of Annas will not be an easy task for corrupt leaders.
I am of the view that technology is bringing another mammoth change to our life. Hence, in this changing environment, best strategy for government & our corrupt politicians will be to change themselves before they are forced to change.